Niches surrounding the three lower galleries: Dhyani
(or Medidation) buddhas with specific mudra:
-
East Akshobhya
bumisparca-mudra: summoning the world as witness: left hand rests opened in lap, right hand covers right knee.
-
North Amogasiddha
abhaya-mudra: not fearing danger, left hand rests opened in lap, right and is raised and opened to the viewer.
-
West Amithaba
dyanamudra: meditating: left hand rests opened in lap, right hand rests opened in the left hand.
-
South Ratnasambhawa
waramudra: giving favour or blessing: left hand rests opened in lap, right hand is turned down to cover right knee, but palm faces viewer.
Fifth storey gallery: 64 Dyani buddhas Vairocana in witarka mudra - teaching, giving instruction or addressing persons: left hand rests in lap, right hand is raised as in
waramudra, but first finger touches the thumb and is separate from the index finger.
Arupadhatu: Buddha Vajrasattva, dharmacakramudra, turning the wheel dharma: left arm and hand are raised to breast level and the index finger nearly touches the thumb. The right hand makes an OK sign and touches the left hand.
Attributes: All the buddha statues have an uncovered right shoulder, are in sitting position with an undergarment visible at his legs.
-
Ushnisha round protuberance of hair in the middle of the skull.
-
Hair in small curls, twisted to the right - covers his head completely.
-
Urna small lump between eye-brows of buddha and
bodhisatvas.
-
Mudra hand positions allowing differentiation between various buddhas. Manushi buddhas often appear with the mudra of a Dhyani buddha. Only Cakyamuni has a beggar bowl as
attribute, others have none.
Rediscovery and restoration
The existence of the Borobudur was known to the Javanese even before Raffles' visit as witnessed by references to
"redi Borobudur" in the Babad Tanah Jawa (Mas Dana who rebelled against Pakubuwana I was captured there 1709-1710) and elsewhere.
Interest in the Borobudur greatly increased after 1814 when Cornelius visits Borobudur
at the behest of Raffles, who heard of the ruins existence in Semarang. With 200
men and in 1.5 months he uncovers the monument. Starting with Sieburgh
in1837, painters and photographers visited the monument, driven by their own
interest or as part of official missions such as Wilsen and Schoenberg Mueller
in 1948-53. The first photographs were taken in 1845 by Schaeffer, but it was
Van Kinsbergen's careful and artistic work of 1873 that was to become famous and
inspire Gauguin's work. The stream of interested visitors continues unabated
leading to the discovery of the hidden base by IJzerman in 1885. The plethora of
sculpture attracted collectors, and even the Government believed there was
plenty so that when King Chulalongkorn of Siam visited in 1896 he was given five Dhyani
buddha, two lions, a makara gargoyle, lion-heads from staircase wings, kala heads &c.
The Borobudur display at the Exposition Mondial in Paris in 1900 added to the
temple's fame, and in that year a Committee was inaugurated and charged with
advising the Government about the restauration of the Borobudur.
The Borobudur Committee was chaired by Brandes and included the then still unknown
2nd Lieutenant van Erp who was to supervise and lead the actual restoration.
Working with a budget of F48,000 (to which later F10,000 was added for
photography), van Erp's work focussed in the first instance on improving the
sewerage works, making urgent repairs and a partial restoration. As work
progressed many stones and sculptures found their way back to the monument from
the village.
In the second stage of the restoration, starting in 1909,
the focus moved beyond urgent repairs and the "reunion of that what time
had separated" to recreating the elements that were key to building, to
recapture the thought that motivated its construction". In so doing, van
Erp's approach did not allow for the creation of what was never there, instead
he aimed to recapture the strong horizontal lines of the upper plinths of the
main walls, and the visual reverberation of the power of repetition emanating
from the niches topping these walls.
Van Erp in his restoration moved
beyond the prevention of further decay and stopped well short of recreating what
was not there. His careful work and the continued focus on the whole, rather
than series of minute details alone made his restoration exemplary, and his
approach laid the foundation - though be it with a lag - for future work.
In
1968 a large scale renewed renovation was undertaken in which the foundation was
further strengthened, and (rain) water treatment improved. This restoration was
completed in 1983 when the temple was reopened in a new park setting.
.
Mounted: 6-Jan-06; last edited: 13-Jul-08